<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Web Rankings Archives - SCD Information Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.scdit.com/web-rankings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description>We fix IT and you benefit...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2021 17:37:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Ampersand in SEO character count</title>
		<link>http://blog.scdit.com/ampersand-in-seo-character-count/</link>
					<comments>http://blog.scdit.com/ampersand-in-seo-character-count/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dwayne Grimes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2021 17:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Google Listing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Console]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebmasterTools]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scdit.com/?p=14662</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Writing for Search Engines limits you to a certain character count, so we wondered if was better to use the Ampersand versus the word &#8221; and &#8220;? Part of the reason is the ampersand gets converted to HTML entities and is listed as &#8221; amp&#38; &#8220; which equals 6 characters. Using &#8220;and&#8221; would be &#8221; [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://blog.scdit.com/ampersand-in-seo-character-count/">Ampersand in SEO character count</a> appeared first on <a href="http://blog.scdit.com">SCD Information Technology</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.scdit.com/ampersand-in-seo-character-count/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>AMP Ping Up Joomla Website</title>
		<link>http://blog.scdit.com/amp-ping-up-joomla-website/</link>
					<comments>http://blog.scdit.com/amp-ping-up-joomla-website/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dwayne Grimes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2021 19:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joomla Component]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Console]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebmasterTools]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scdit.com/?p=14353</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Accelerated Mobile Pages (AMP) make your website more digestible for Google and has been adopted over the past 5 years by the other search engines. Google currently being the most utilized search engine, and the focus of this article. The goal for AMP is to make the content delivered more quickly for mobile users by [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://blog.scdit.com/amp-ping-up-joomla-website/">AMP Ping Up Joomla Website</a> appeared first on <a href="http://blog.scdit.com">SCD Information Technology</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.scdit.com/amp-ping-up-joomla-website/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Domain Expiration SEO Registration Is Set To Expire &#8211; Scam</title>
		<link>http://blog.scdit.com/seo-registration-is-set-to-expire-scam/</link>
					<comments>http://blog.scdit.com/seo-registration-is-set-to-expire-scam/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dwayne Grimes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2017 13:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Rankings]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scdeval.com/?p=52</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>We have recently received a couple of emails asking us to re-register our SEO ( Search Engine Optimization ). There is a link to pay. This is obviously a scam. The SEO are carefully crafted words in the webpage. You can pay someone to craft the SEO and put it in the page, but you [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://blog.scdit.com/seo-registration-is-set-to-expire-scam/">Domain Expiration SEO Registration Is Set To Expire &#8211; Scam</a> appeared first on <a href="http://blog.scdit.com">SCD Information Technology</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.scdit.com/seo-registration-is-set-to-expire-scam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Google Ranking Websites With SSL higher?</title>
		<link>http://blog.scdit.com/is-google-ranking-websites-with-ssl-higher/</link>
					<comments>http://blog.scdit.com/is-google-ranking-websites-with-ssl-higher/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dwayne Grimes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2017 18:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Rankings]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scdeval.com/?p=47</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>We have been hearing about this since the beginning of the year, and yes we are hearing this from our hosting companies. We used Sucuri a number of times to have a some nasty website attacks cleaned up. They have also recently paired up with some hosting companies such as SiteGround because of the number [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://blog.scdit.com/is-google-ranking-websites-with-ssl-higher/">Is Google Ranking Websites With SSL higher?</a> appeared first on <a href="http://blog.scdit.com">SCD Information Technology</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.scdit.com/is-google-ranking-websites-with-ssl-higher/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
